• Total word limit = 5000  (excl. title page, abstract, ref list, appendices, headings, tables & figures);
  • Abstract: summarises the project, in no more than 250 words. (Model this on a journal article abstract);
  • Introduction: see workshop in wk 8 + info in pdf ‘Info on content and formatting of FYP’ on moodle;
  • Method: info in pdf ‘Info on content and formatting of FYP’ on moodle;
  • Results: see workshop in wk 21 + info in pdf ‘Info on content and formatting of FYP’ on moodle;
  • Discussion: as above for results;


This study has been approved by the school of psychology, at the university of Kent, ethics committee


SPSS v27 (windows + mac)

ONLY available as a software DOWNLOAD

  • https://www.kent.ac.uk/softwareSee the ‘Download study-related software’ link‘Sign In’ link  (top right corner)Choose University of Kent and loginSearch for ‘SPSS’, complete the form and you will be emailed a download link.Follow the instructions carefully please.

Look under FYP module for more details/files   – Kent Moodle


 Pls ask support team for login

Study: https://kentpsych.eu.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_dbruGMhucno

The data results that need to be analysed.

Please watch this recording for what needs to be included: https://kent.cloud.panopto.eu/Panopto/Pages/Viewer.aspx?id=abd1251a-1c87-47c1-b11d-acf400fdc752


for the loot box purchase I had significant between subjects effect as .009

for spending money vs not in fifa p = .018

we need to send the spss output files as well?

just send the outputs that he gave us, and then any others that you have (like demographic and descriptive statistics)

there were 112 combinations and they were each repeated twice so 224 TRIALS in total

IVs I had were the group (buyers v non-buyers) and the salience (salient v neutral) meaning they had 2 levels each And it was an experimental design

duration (400-1600ms) is a categorial variable in the design

(c) for qualtrics as that’s what he did in his previous paper

(r) for everything else

247 total participants

Please send me the spss data output files.

Include relevant appendices, citations.

Sourches for the quetionaires:

Brooks, G. A., & Clark, L. (2019). Associations between loot box use, problematic gaming and gambling, and gambling-related cognitions. Addictive Behaviors, 96, 26–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2019.04.009

DSM-5: Cho, H., Kwon, M., Choi, J.-H., Lee, S.-K., Choi, J. S., Choi, S.-W., & Kim, D.-J. (2014). Development of the Internet addiction scale based on the Internet Gaming Disorder criteria suggested in DSM-5. Addictive Behaviors, 39(9), 1361–1366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2014.01.020

Canadian Adolescent Gambling Inventory: Wiebe, J., Wynne, H., Stinchfield, R., & Tremblay, J. (2007). The Canadian Adolescent Gambling Inventory (CAGI) Phase II Final Report. Alberta Gaming Research Institute. https://doi.org/10.11575/PRISM/9905

Gould’s model of addictions: Gould’s model of addiction to show that cognitive disruptions are a core feature of addiction because it helped explain why we are doing the study


Please let me know if there is any additional information ne

Type of service: Dissertation Services
Type of assignment: Dissertation
Subject: Psychology
Pages/words: 19/5000
Number of Sources: 0
Academic level: Bachelor’s
Paper Format: APA
Line spacing: Double
Language style: UK English

Why us

Free features

get started