Posted on

Description

In determining whether a defendant has breached their duty of care, it is frequently

stated that alongside the (i) likelihood that someone may be injured and (ii) the

potential severity of the injuries which may occur, the court must also consider (iii)

the social benefit or value of the defendant’s activity and (iv) the cost of taking

preventative measures. However, in practice, the final two factors rarely seem to

carry any weight.’

Does this statement accurately represent the law? Discuss, with reference to cases

Relating to breach of duty / The standard of care in the tort of negligence. Relevant legal knowledge level: high and Analysis level: medium

Type of service: Academic Paper Writing
Type of assignment: Essay
Subject: Law
Pages/words: 6/1500
Number of Sources: 8
Academic level: Undergraduate
Paper Format: OSCOLA
Line spacing: Double
Language style: UK English